Article1 # 4 2020

DOI: 10.33868/0365-8392-2020-4-264-2-9
© Oleksiy Klimenko, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Acting Deputy Director of State Road Transport Research Institute, e-mail: aklimenko.insat@gmail.com, ORCID: 0000-0002-2323-6839

REGARDING THE THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF SYSTEM MANAGEMENT OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION BY ROAD TRANSPORT
Abstract. Suggestions for the development of theoretical and methodological foundations of system management of energy efficiency and environmental pollution by road transport in the life cycle are given. It takes into account all essential areas covering transportation, infrastructure, maintenance, also energy, chemical and automotive industries, raw material extraction, utilization, and related processes of energy consumption and environmental pollution, distributed in space and time. A universal structural scheme of the “supersystem” is proposed, which reflects the processes of consumption of energy, material and other resources, distributed environmental pollution through the functioning of road transport and related industries, and linked damage as well. The target function of the “supersystem” can be represented as the fulfilment during a certain period (covering the life cycle of the main elements – objects of influence (regulation) and investment of financial resources) of the specified volumes of certain types of transport work with the minimum possible and economically justified consumption of energy, consumables, materials, other resources (including those consumed by the transportation, infrastructure, maintenance, also energy, chemical and automotive industries, raw material extraction, utilization), the minimum possible losses due to artificial pressure on the recipients (human beings, fauna and flora, buildings, etc.) of directly the transport system and infrastructure, as well as side effects of processes in other elements of the “supersystem”, that may be reduced to the total cost of transport, taking into account the inflation index of monetary units. It is proposed to carry out a mathematical description of complicated sets, dynamically distributed in the space of objects that change the structure and properties over time, based on the further development of such a tool as the theory of multisets. In a simplified form, it is presented an example of a fragment of the management system based on measures to regulate the first access of vehicles to the market, further operation, and to certain elements of infrastructure, with the introduction of low emission zones in cities. The development, creation and effective functioning of the management system of transport and related sectors of the economy in those mentioned above and other parts, requires a coherent system approach based on forecasting (modelling) the consequences of decisions, which can be implemented using the tools described in this article.
Keywords: wheeled vehicles, road transport, systems management, energy efficiency, environmental pollution.

References
1. Sadler Consultants Ltd. (2020). Urban Access Regulations in Europe: Overview of website. https://www.urbanaccessregulations.eu/userhome/general-overview.
2. Air quality in Europe. (2015). EEA Report No 5/2015.
3. Bernard, Y., Miller, J., Wappelhorst, S., Braun, C. (2020). Impacts of the Paris low-emission zone and implications for other cities. FIA Foundation. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/Paris-LEV-implications-03.12.2020.pdf.
4.Development of national policy on regulation of road transport CO2 emissions and energy consumption in Ukraine – Clima East project report / Ricardo Energy & Environment (United Kingdom), State Enterprise State Road Transport Research Institute (Ukraine), 212).
5. Ambient air pollutionю (2016). A global assessment of exposure and burden of disease. World Health Organisation. ISBN 978 92 4 1511353.
6. Hooftman, N., Oliveira, L., Messagie, M., Coosemans, T., Van Mierlo, J. (2016). Environ-mental Analysis of Petrol, Diesel and Electric Passenger Cars in a Belgian Urban Setting. En-ergies , 9, 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9020084.
7. Brennan, J. W. and Barder, T. E. (2017). Battery Electric Vehicles vs. Internal Combustion En-gine Vehicles: A United States-Based Compre-hensive Assessment. Arthur D. Little 2016.: https://www.adlittle.com/en/insights/viewpoints/battery-electric-vehicles-vs-internal-combustion-engine-vehicles.
8. McKone, T. E., Hertwich, E. G. (2001). The human toxicity potential and a Strategy for Evaluating Model Performance in Life Cycle Impact Assessment. Int. J. LCA 6, 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02977846.
9. United Kingdom by CPI Group (UK) Ltd. (2017). Environmental Impacts of Road Vehicles Past, Present and Future. Issues in environmental science and technology No. 44. The Royal Society of Chemistry. Croydon, 248.